Article
Home > Crime

Woman drunk but not at fault

Published: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 5:51 a.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 6:23 a.m.
BRADENTON -

Schoolteacher Ruth Patricia Gerding was driving drunk last July when a motorcyclist slammed into her car, throwing the biker to her death.

Ruth Gerding

Gerding was prosecuted for DUI manslaughter and faced up to 15 years in prison and the lifetime loss of her driver's license. Her blood alcohol level was nearly three times the level at which Florida drivers are considered impaired. She has a DUI conviction in her record.

But the motorcyclist, Donna Lucille Bounds of Palmetto, was also drunk that night -- leaving jurors Tuesday to determine whether to assign blame solely to Gerding for the fatal crash on U.S. 41 at 69th Street East in North Manatee County.

The four women and two men of the panel decided after an hour that Gerding, 31, did not cause -- or even contribute to -- the death of Bounds. Gerding was found guilty of DUI, a misdemeanor, and sentenced to a year in the Manatee County jail.

"I think this was a life-altering experience," said a friend, Catherine Holzwart, who was among supporters who urged Circuit Judge Debra Johnes Riva not impose a jail sentence against Gerding. There were no family members for Bounds in court.

Earlier, Gerding and her attorney, Jeffrey S. Keel, rejected a prosecutor's plea deal for about 10 years in prison -- the minimum for DUI manslaughter.

Keel took a chance with the jurors.

A central issue in the case was whether Gerding had a green arrow before she made a left turn shortly after midnight on the night of the wreck. Gerding, who lives in St. Petersburg, was house-sitting for relatives in North Manatee.

After the crash, Gerding called a friend, who said in court Monday that Gerding told her she had a green arrow. Gerding was hysterical in the call.

"Oh my God. Oh my God," Gerding told her friend. "I think the person is dead."

But there were no witnesses to support the green-arrow claim.

Cpl. David R. Brunner of the Florida Highway Patrol spent days investigating the crash. His analysis including assessing the timing of the traffic lights on U.S. 41 at 69th Street East.

Gerding, Brunner said, would have had to stop at the light to trigger a cycle and a green, left-turn arrow. Cameras atop the lights control the cycle. The cameras do not record.

Brunner determined north and south traffic on U.S. 41 had green lights. A driver on 69th Street East told troopers he had a red light.

Assistant State Attorney Garrett R. Franzen urged jurors to use common sense -- that even if Gerding had a green arrow, and the right-of-way, she would not have knowingly driven into the path of another vehicle.

In the least, Franzen said, jurors should find that Gerding contributed to the motorcyclist's death even if the panel did not believe Gerding was 100 percent responsible for the crash.

Bounds made no attempt to avoid striking the side of the car in front of her, Brunner said.

Gerding's eyes were bloodshot and watery. She had trouble keeping her balance, Brunner said. Gerding's blood-alcohol level was measured at .230 -- nearly three times the limit at which Florida drivers are considered intoxicated.

At trial, Gerding's attorney agreed Gerding was drunk. But Keel pinned blame for the crash on Bounds, whose blood-alcohol content was .169 -- more than twice the .08 level that Florida drivers are considered impaired.

Bounds also did not have an endorsement on her license to ride motorcycles.

Gerding was emotionless after a court clerk read aloud the verdict, rendered after about an hour of deliberation.

At one point, Gerding turned and smiled at her supporters.

Gerding has been free on bail since her arrest. She gave up using a car even though she could have pursued getting a hardship license. Gerding continued teaching.

Keel, the attorney, said Gerding will now keep her job as a teacher because of the jury's verdict.


This story appeared in print on page BS1

Comments

  1. FLAFRED says...
    July 23, 2008 5:25:17 am

    RE: http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20080723/ARTICLE/807230333
    Not to approve of drunk-driving...but this was still 'accident'. They were equally at fault. If the driver of the car was not inpaired she might have seen that the motorcycle was not obeying the traffic light.The driver of the motorcycle, on the other hand, was not licensed and drove into the side of the car which would not have been avoidible for the car driver.It's nice to see, the jury having no predjudices,coming to a fair decision. The driver of the car has obiviouly learned a life-changing lesson.

  2. toots2375 says...
    July 23, 2008 9:29:43 am

    While I don't condone drunk driving, I am pleased with the verdict offered. She didn't kill that motorcyclist. The motorcyclist did. At least she accepted accountability for what she did. She doesn't even drive anymore...

  3. patnok says...
    July 23, 2008 12:04:07 pm

    and she is doing a year in jail.

  4. herald says...
    July 23, 2008 12:51:55 pm


    C'mon. You have the green arrow you go. Whether she might have seen the motorcycle driven by someone not licensed to drive a motorcycle doesn't mean she's at fault.

  5. BillyBy54 says...
    July 23, 2008 9:25:35 pm

    Her friend calls this a "life-changing" accident for Ms. Gerding.

    Her life should have "changed" when she was arrested and convicted of DUI...THE FIRST TIME.

    Maybe there would have been no "life-ending" accident for Donna Bounds. Maybe she would have hit a tree down the street. We do not know.

    We do know, however, that Gerding chose to drink and drive AGAIN. Revoke her Driver's License for life.

    The Lad
    ...sorry, but in this game, two strikes and you're out.

  6. awr1949 says...
    July 25, 2008 7:47:02 am

    A Juror's Perspective

    I was selected as a juror for this trial and my colleagues appointed me as foreperson.
    I could elaborate but in the end it came down to reasonable doubt that the defendant had the right of way at the intersection as indicated in the defense witness statement that the defendant had called him after the accident and told him this fact.
    The prosecution objected to this line of questioning and after some debate it was allowed. It was never brought out in court that the defendant had a prior DUI so this was not part of the evidence presented to the jury.
    It was also not mentioned in the newspaper article that the deceased tested positive for cocaine which will exacerbate impairment due to alcohol.
    This was a tragic case which involved a loss of life and from my point of view, a difficult case to try. I hope we the jury did the right thing. The defendant was sentenced to a year in jail and I sincerely hope she has a full and useful life after her incarceration which will give her time to reflect on her actions.
    I have to believe that justice has been served.

  7. BillyBy54 says...
    July 25, 2008 7:53:52 am

    Very well said, and very well thought out. You sound like you were the right person to be foreman.

    Don't be a stranger on these forums.

    The Lad

Next Article in Local Crime